Case Study: Building an AEO-Optimized AI Platform

Project Goal: Create a reference site for AI concepts that is optimized for both human readers and AI answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, demonstrating Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) techniques.

The Challenge

Traditional SEO optimizes for search engine rankings. Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) optimizes for being cited in AI-generated responses. These require different approaches to content structure, markup, and information architecture.

The challenge was to create content that AI tools would recognize as authoritative and cite-worthy while remaining useful for human readers.

Scope and Constraints

To make this a manageable portfolio project, I set specific constraints:

These constraints forced focus on content quality and structure rather than technical complexity.

6
Content Pages
3
Schema Types
100%
Valid Schemas
0
JavaScript

Content Strategy

Answer-First Structure

Every page follows this pattern:

  1. H1 with the exact question being answered
  2. Definition block with complete answer in first 150 words
  3. Answer block with immediate explanation
  4. Detailed sections using clear H2 headers
  5. FAQ section with common follow-up questions

This structure ensures AI tools find the answer immediately while giving human readers options for deeper exploration.

Topic Selection

I chose concepts that met specific criteria:

Writing Style

Key principles:

Technical Implementation

Schema Markup

I manually implemented three schema types on every relevant page:

Article Schema includes headline, description, author, publisher, dates, and word count. This helps search engines understand page content and freshness.

FAQPage Schema structures questions and answers in a machine-readable format. This enables FAQ rich results in search and helps AI tools extract specific Q&A pairs.

Breadcrumb Schema shows information hierarchy and navigation structure. This helps both users and search engines understand site organization.

All schemas were validated using Google's Rich Results Test. Manual implementation gave complete control over what information was emphasized.

Internal Linking Strategy

Every concept page links to 3-4 related concepts where they naturally connect in the content. This creates a knowledge graph that:

Footer navigation provides secondary paths to all pages for both users and crawlers.

Performance Optimization

To maximize speed and accessibility:

Pages load in under 1 second even on slow connections.

Design Decisions

Why Plain HTML?

Frameworks add complexity without value for this use case. Plain HTML is fast, deployable anywhere, and gives full control over markup for schema optimization.

Why Manual Schema?

Schema plugins often add unnecessary markup or miss optimization opportunities. Manual implementation ensures exactly the right data is marked up in exactly the right way.

Why 5 Core Pages?

Better to have 5 excellent pages than 50 mediocre ones. This scope allowed high quality content and thorough testing within project timeline.

Why Add Applied Example?

Conceptual pages demonstrate understanding. The applied RAG system page demonstrates ability to design production systems, making this more valuable for technical roles.

Why Include About and Case Study?

These pages transform the site from content demo into product thinking demo. They show decision-making process and strategic thinking involved in building this product.

Testing Methodology

To measure AEO effectiveness, I developed a testing protocol:

Baseline Testing

Before launch, I tested each question against ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overview. I recorded:

Post-Launch Testing

After launch, I ran the same tests to measure if AI tools started citing this site. I compared:

Iteration Testing

For each content change, I:

Results

Schema Validation

All pages passed Google Rich Results Test with zero errors. Article, FAQ, and Breadcrumb schemas validated correctly across all pages.

Site Structure

Achieved target information architecture:

AEO Testing Results

After deployment, I observed:

Key Findings

Structure Beats Volume

Five well-structured pages outperform fifty poorly organized ones. Clear hierarchy, consistent formatting, and front-loaded answers make content more discoverable and more useful.

Schema Implementation Is Critical

Structured data significantly impacts how search engines and AI tools understand content. Manual implementation is time-consuming but provides complete control.

Internal Linking Creates Authority

Connecting related concepts helps establish topical authority. Every concept should link to at least 3-4 related concepts where connections are natural.

Answer-First Works

Putting complete answers in the first 150 words serves both human readers and AI systems. Readers get quick answers, AI tools find quotable content immediately.

What I Would Build Next

More Applied Examples

Add 3-5 more pages showing concepts in practice. Examples: "Designing a Prompt Chain for Customer Support", "Building a Classification System with Fine-Tuning", "Vector Search Implementation Patterns".

Comparison Guides

Create pages that compare approaches. Examples: "RAG vs Fine-Tuning: When to Use Each", "Vector Search vs Keyword Search", "Single Prompt vs Prompt Chain".

Longer-Form Testing

Run 30-day tests on content variations. Test different answer lengths, section structures, and FAQ formats to measure what performs best.

Visual Diagrams

Add detailed architecture diagrams to each page showing how concepts work visually. This would improve both understanding and shareability.

Interactive Examples

Build simple interactive demos showing how concepts work in practice. Example: a prompt chain where you can see each step's output.